Writing /var/www/alexforencich.com/wiki/data/cache/0/07be79a1043b0c75f7c4a65ca13c557c.xhtml failed
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
en:photo:equipment:canon-ef-24-105 [2011/05/20 21:48] alex [Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Lens] |
en:photo:equipment:canon-ef-24-105 [2011/11/10 01:31] (current) alex [LensFun Calibration Data] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ===== LensFun Calibration Data ===== | ===== LensFun Calibration Data ===== | ||
| - | This is my [[http://lensfun.berlios.de/|LensFun]] entry for this lens. The distortion values listed are the default values that are included with the library. Unfortunately, following the [[http://lensfun.berlios.de/lens-calibration/lens-calibration.html|lens calibration guide]], I was unable to get ''tca_correct'' to output values that gave any sort of improvement on the transverse chromatic aberration. I just ended up manually selecting values for first order correction, producing a much better result than I could get from ''tca_correct''. Values below only tested on camera with crop factor of 1.6. | + | This is my [[http://lensfun.berlios.de/|LensFun]] entry for this lens. The distortion values listed are the default values that are included with the library. Unfortunately, following the [[http://lensfun.berlios.de/lens-calibration/lens-calibration.html|lens calibration guide]], I was unable to get ''tca_correct'' to output anything meaningful. Most of the values were far off the scale that ufraw could deal with (ufraw/lensfun wants +/- 0.01 but I was geting +/- 0.5 or more). I just ended up manually selecting values for first order correction, producing a much better result than I could get from ''tca_correct''. Values below only tested on camera with crop factor of 1.6. |
| <code> | <code> | ||